There are no page numbers at all, they’ve been deleted, instead, it is done by line or word … so (Location 870) might be how a highlighted piece of text is referenced. How I deal with this should I quote an author I don’t yet know.
If it takes me as long to work through my notes and highlights as it took me to read the chapter in the first place … then I simply accept that I have still got a heck of a lot to learn and that in good time, these points, squirreled away will bounce back into my life with a click of my fingers.
A book, for example.
Ask, a literary agent has asked.
My contact lenses are stuck to my eyeballs and the skin under the pads of my thumb are chafed from scooting back and forth over a keyboard.
Am I learning anything though?
That a great deal of nonsence is written. That authors must be pillored if they use strings of abbreviations and terms that are not common place. Courtesy of Kindle and an e-book I was able to see, for example, how often LOM was used in the body of a book. Four times it turned out, and in three it had been written out in full and in the fourth as LOMS it meant something else.
This I my bugbear about the use of the highly technical descriptors: more, very, truly and actually.
Kindle will drive some people crazy at is potential. I see a way into the minds of many authors. My son dismissed it. One of his friends, I can’t get away from it.
There’s a way to write for a Kindle. Ditch many diagrams and tables. Think in terms of graphics that would work on TV (in black and white). Write short sentences (these are good discipline).
Meanwhile I have generated 11 pages of quotes and notes (4,000 words) having so far only regurgitated my thoughts on the introduction and chapter one to Rhona Sharpe’s ‘Rethinking Pedagogy for the Digital Age’ (2007). It’s that kind of book.
(Even if I keep disagreeing with the authors)