It is intriguing and of value to be covering learning processes from a different angle; there is some overlap.
The MAODE of course offers greater depth, how we learn is its modus operandi.
The weakness of someone else’s conception of learning processes offered in relative isolation is apparent. I am surprised that Engestrom gets no mention as ‘activity systems’ were developed and used in business settings.
Several such models need to be be offered together:
a) to expose a model for what they are, a conception of reality
b) one person’s take, their simplification of something complex.
Tangentially Deguid and John Seeley Brown are brought in so I could search my own blog for 23 points where I have read them before, my knowledge, like coral, growing and firming up in the process. ‘Metaphor’ and ‘analogy’ are discussed, though the only resource offered leaves me befuddled as the concepts are written up in academic business-speak.
I’d like a far broader reading list; rather than three or four chapters offered in the resources book I’d like to see the reassuring long and personal list of the authors, linked by URL to papers that are readily available online. I can see myself Googling authors to see what they have published most recently.
I feel the case is made for external agencies as I don’t see too many of the techniques occurring in large organisations.
As our authors say people quickly acquire the mindset of the organisation they work for, this becomes the default position for solving problems.
Certain functions from advertising to consultancy, web, PR and design are best bought in under competitive tender.
Whilst the case is made for intuition over objective analysis I don’t see the ‘hunch’ outside the privately run business or agency as a means to get an idea through.
Rosabeth Moss Kanter may talk of the ‘Hollywood’ approach to projects, but I don’t see the flexibility or process that has pots of money to invest on ideas that are pitched ‘Hollywood’ style.
I find, at times, I feel as if I am defacing the script from ‘Good Morning Vietnam’ in which an army communications paladin theorizes about what makes a joke in a services radio show whereas the Robin Williams character is intuitively, on a hunch, inventive, engaging and witty. As he is in ‘Dead Poets Society’.
Is creativity therefore meant to educate an organisation, department or person on how to improvise?
And surely such opportunities are only possible where systems, seniority or shortness of contract offers.